Katerina Jebb

Mouth Of A Sex Doll, 1999, digital scan on paper, 23.4 x 15.75 inches

Joan Agajanian Quinn speaks with the Paris-based artist about her experimental photography process and distinctive subject matter.

 

Katerina Jebb is a British artist and filmmaker. Her work has appeared internationally in museums and galleries, notably The Whitney Museum in 1998 as part of The Warhol Look, a world-touring retrospective. In 2016 Jebb's work was the subject of a solo exhibition at Musée Réattu, Arles, France. In 2018 she was commissioned by The Metropolitan Museum and The Vatican to collaborate on the show Heavenly Bodies: Fashion and the Catholic Imagination. In 2021, The Victoria & Albert Museum commissioned her to create an installation in the main Sculpture Hall spotlighting and reframing archival work from the Museum's collection.

Katerina’s work is included in the permanent collections of The Victoria & Albert Museum, Le Musée des Arts Decoratifs Paris, and Musée Réattu Arles.

Joan Agajanian Quinn: I've known you a long time, will you tell our readers about yourself? 

Katerina Jebb: I was born in the United Kingdom in 1962. I have lived in Paris for about three decades. I discovered the medium of digital scanography in the early nineties, and it’s my primary vehicle for making artworks. I didn’t go to art school; thus, my way of making art is somewhat childlike and experimental. In the nineties, I used to lie myself down on a large format scanner and make self-portraits. I discovered that I could invite other people to lie down on the scanner and make life-size portraits. Each scan required seven minutes of the subject lying motionless, so I quickly understood that it was not an immediate outcome as I would make many scans to form a composition that pleased me.

I became aware that as well as studying living human subject matter, I could also make accurate reproductions of inanimate objects. These studies were cold and forensic in appearance, positioning them in direct conflict with the painterly aspect of the human portraits. This, in fact, illustrated a duality within the medium; the existence of two different languages expressed by the same machine. What still inspires me today is the possibility of reproducing an inanimate object which exists as evidence of a human’s attachment to materialism.

Nude Torso, 2017, digital scan on paper, 67.4 x 41.4 inches

Ladies Tights, 1996, digital scan on paper, 33.5 x 23.6 inches

Auto Portrait Oral, 1996, digital scan on paper, 39.5 x 39.5 inches

JAQ: What are your thoughts when you start a new piece?  

KJ: I try to be inventive; I try not to repeat myself or anyone else. I need to feel intrigued by my own subject matter. Obviously, I search for truth and meaning. 

JAQ: Why this medium? It's not common... 

KJ: It is the medium I have grown up with. There is a profound aspect to the visual which denies the immediacy of its making. There is a feeling of the subject drowning in himself. It is a physical interaction with the object viewing it with an invisible force. A metaphysical presence all around, which I always listen to. Scanographic artworks somehow imbue the object with a sense of otherness. The scanner is a moving trajectory that produces an image over time. In the medium of scanography, there is no split-second or decisive moment. The time elapsed to make a three-meter work could be considered the same amount of time as to make a painting.

Time is the most essential element that differentiates scanography from photography. It is a highly imaginative exercise that allows me to be spontaneously creative as I make the work on the spot, like painting. I build a composition. 

Telegram Marcel Duchamp to Francis Picabia, 1953, 2012, digital scan on paper, 39.4 x 31 inches

Supermarket Chicken, 2020, digital scan on paper, 19.7 x 11.8 inches

JAQ: Where do you find your source material?

KJ: The sources, sometimes they are suggested, sometimes they are proposed... Sometimes I make investigations following my intuition. I may go into an archive of an artist I am obsessed with. Other times I am contacted by museums to do research in their archives, which is a privileged experience. I always go to flea markets where I discover strange and beautiful objects to document or just look at. I also collect rare books which form a part of my work. 

JAQ: You had an incredible experience in New York at The Met, and in Rome at The Vatican. how did the collaboration unfold?

KJ: I was invited by the Metropolitan Museum to make an inventory of ecclesiastical vestments at the Vatican. I found myself standing in a small room adjoined to the Sistine Chapel holding priceless artifacts, a profound reminder of our place in history.

Fallen White Pigment, The Balthus Inventory, 2011, digital scan on paper, 43.75 x 60.5 inches

Shoe Last, 2016, digital scan on paper, 33.5 x 39.4 inches

JAQ: Have you ever been intimidated by a project?

KJ: I am always intimidated. I always feel intimidated. Every time I make a portrait of someone, I feel slightly anxious at the thought of the physicality of the exchange. I hover over the subject, so it is very imposing on one’s personal space. When holding the scanner, which weighs approximately eleven pounds, I must hold my breath during each forty-second trajectory to produce a stable image. When I make the portrait scans, I am constantly confronting mortality. The physicality of a portrait enters into some kind of abstract state of future immortality. 

JAQ: Where do you see yourself in 10 years?

KJ: A house with a swimming pool and a large, silver fridge with a water dispenser.

JAQ: Fabulous, I’ll join you…

 

Self-portrait, 1996, digital scan on paper, 20.25 x 16.60 inches